<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An opt-in mailing list: better results in the long run</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johndschultz.com/an-opt-in-mailing-list-better-results-in-the-long-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johndschultz.com/an-opt-in-mailing-list-better-results-in-the-long-run/</link>
	<description>auctioneer, runner, sports fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 67% of your customers prefer to communicate by email : John D Schultz</title>
		<link>http://johndschultz.com/an-opt-in-mailing-list-better-results-in-the-long-run/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>67% of your customers prefer to communicate by email : John D Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndschultz.com/?p=178#comment-886</guid>
		<description>[...] discussed in my previous post, use of an opt-in mailing list is a business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed in my previous post, use of an opt-in mailing list is a business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan George</title>
		<link>http://johndschultz.com/an-opt-in-mailing-list-better-results-in-the-long-run/comment-page-1/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndschultz.com/?p=178#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>No, you don&#039;t need all of that.  They sell all those things in different parts of the country.  But the concept is invaluable.  You would probably not need geographic categories--and only need 5-8 categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you don&#039;t need all of that.  They sell all those things in different parts of the country.  But the concept is invaluable.  You would probably not need geographic categories&#8211;and only need 5-8 categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D Schultz</title>
		<link>http://johndschultz.com/an-opt-in-mailing-list-better-results-in-the-long-run/comment-page-1/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>John D Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndschultz.com/?p=178#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve thought about segmenting our lists down to specific lists.  At the moment, we&#039;re mesh our real estate and auction clients under the premise that they&#039;re interested in our company.  Although, using my comments above, further segmentation may be in order.Schrader has a ton of categories.  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d roll with so many categories.  Sometimes simpler is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve thought about segmenting our lists down to specific lists.  At the moment, we&#039;re mesh our real estate and auction clients under the premise that they&#039;re interested in our company.  Although, using my comments above, further segmentation may be in order.Schrader has a ton of categories.  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d roll with so many categories.  Sometimes simpler is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

