All this social networking can be intimidating.  In the struggle to stay on top of the two major sites Facebook and Twitter, it has been increasingly common for the same status to serve both services.  I’m all for it.  In fact, I do this for our company page and personally.  Yet, most get it all wrong!

Like I said, I’m all for implementing a “touch it once” philosophy when it comes to posting to Facebook and Twitter.  However, I’m all for it being done correctly.  You may be asking yourself “there’s a right way and a wrong way?”  I’m here to tell you that indeed there is a wrong way and a right way.

First, the wrong way.  It seems simple enough to enable the Facebook to Twitter application.  Using this application, offered by Facebook, posts your Facebook status to Twitter.  However, when it posts the status it also posts a link.  The link directs users to your status on Facebook.  No more information is obtained by clicking on the link.  Fundamentally, links should be informational, and the use of a link to direct me to the exact information I just read is inefficient, and inconsiderate of your reader’s time!

Now, the right way.  You should be posting from Twitter to Facebook.  Why? Because Twitter is set up to share 140-character messages (similar to a status in Facebook).  Using any number of applications – Selective Tweets, a Facebook app; Seesmic, a standalone social network app; and my favorite TweetDeck, a standalone social network app – you can update your Twitter status and your Facebook status (even multiple accounts – I have both personal and work Twitter and Facebook accounts) from one place.  You can easily share links that give context to your status and not send readers to links that share no more information.

Why is this important?  Because, when providing me with links that offer no other information, it’s like crying wolf.  I eventually tune out your links, and stop clicking on them all together.  Which means, when you do provide an informational link, I’m likely to miss it altogether because you’ve cried wolf so many times!

Take a serious look at how you’re implementing your social networking.  If you’re using Facebook to update Twitter, you need to understand what the Twitter user is experiencing, and how you’re negatively impacting their experiences!  If you’re trying to reach both social networks and their users, you need to act like you belong.

As of late, the buzz words in the auction industry, and many industries, are “social networking.”  However, the implementation thus far within the auction industry has been spotty at best, and when implemented most get it all wrong.

I’ve written about social networking on two separate occasions in the past both in May of 2008: Jumping into the social conversation without drowning; and Connecting via social networks.  There is some good information that is still pertinent to conversations about social networking, especially in the jumping without drowning post.

In fact, in the jumping without drowning post, I review an article about 12 tips for success in social media.  The last 6 tips focus on “diving into social media” and are: 7. Engage Your Audience; 8. Engage Your Employees; 9. Engage Your Customers; 10. Be Honest and Authentic; 11. Define Metrics According to Business Objectives; and 12. Fail Quickly. Fail Cheaply.

As I look at that short list two things jump out.  First: engage, engage, engage; and second: honest and authentic.  This is where most auction companies get it wrong.  For the most part auction companies understand honest and authentic.  But it’s the engage, engage, engage part where the mark is completely missed.

Auction companies broadcast market events.  They mail hundreds and sometimes thousands of brochures, run multitudes of display ads, and run minutes or more of commercials on radio.  Often, this is just the beginning of the marketing campaign.  However, did you notice one thing these methods all have in common?  Broadcast, broadcast, broadcast.

A primary tenant of social networking is to engage honestly and authentically.  Yet, my experience has been auction companies are so trapped in broadcast mode that they fail to engage.  Rather, they fall back on the old reliable method of broadcast marketing.

What does this mean?  It means almost all the auction companies I follow broadcast links to auctions.  That’s not engaging.  Where is the insider information and tips?  What about links to resources you find, or articles you found interesting?  What about writing informational articles, and then passing that information along via Twitter or Facebook in the form of a link?

What if auction companies engaged their customers?  Companies could promote resources for buyers and for sellers, pass along industry information, provide behind-the-scenes information about upcoming auctions, and so much more.  What about actually interacting and having conversations with customers via Facebook and Twitter?  When it comes time for a customer to use an auctioneer, who are they going to look to first?  The company that merely blasts information, or the company that engages and interacts?  The company that provides useful resources and information to the consumer or the company that merely broadcasts notice about their next auction?

Now, our company is just as guilty of broadcasting, or I should say was just as guilty.  In fact, initially, we set up our website to automatically broadcast every new auction, real estate listing, and update to our Facebook page.  However, we recently turned that feature off.  At the same time, we added our company to Twitter (@SAuctioneers).  We did turn on a feature that will automatically tweet anytime we add a new listing, auction, or update to our website.  However, we’re determined to share links and information to our followers on Facebook and Twitter.  In fact, we’ve incorporated a section called “We’re all a Twitter” to the front page of our website which displays our two most recent tweets.  Consumers will be able to follow us on Twitter, Facebook or the front page of our website for engaging, honest, and authentic information.  They’ll be able to interact with us, learn from us, and teach us.  We’ll be able to share with them, and them with us.  It will be social and relational.

In the end, what are you doing to be social?  Are you broadcasting at the top of your lungs, or are you setting out to engage honestly and authentically those that come in contact with your company?  Given the choice, I know with which person I’d want to hang out!

It’s becoming increasingly common for auction companies to offer online bidding at their auctions. There are a multitude of types of auctions with online bidding. However, I’d like to focus on live auctions that have an online bidding component (i.e. pre-bidding, live bidding, or a combination thereof). In particular, I’d like to examine the registration requirements of two fictitious bidders at an auction with live online bidding. Let’s call the bidders Online Guy, and Onsite Gal. The auction can be of any asset class you’d like, for arguments sake it doesn’t matter.

Online Guy and Onsite Gal both come across an auction that they’d like to attend. They both notice it has online bidding. Onsite Gal has an entire day to spend at the auction. Online Guy on the other hand is taking care of his two toddlers, and finds it more convenient to stay at home than go to the auction with the two toddlers. Online Guy still wants to participate so he decides he’ll bid live online from his home.

Let’s examine the registration process for each bidder.

Onsite Gal
Onsite Gal shows up about twenty minutes before the auction is to begin. She heads over to the clerking trailer and asks for a bidding number. In most cases, the cashier asks for a picture ID. In exchange for the information on the ID, and verification that Onsite Gal is really who she says she is, Onsite Gal is given a bidding number. When Onsite Gal makes a purchase and is ready to leave she is asked to stop and make payment with the cashier. Payment can be in the form of cash, check, or credit card, and once payment is made, she can take her purchases home. However, there is nothing stopping Onsite Gal from leaving the auction with her purchases and not paying.

Online Guy
Online Guy registers a few days before the auction is to begin. He logs in online, and is asked for his address, multiple phone numbers, credit card information, and in some instances is required to provide a bank letter of credit. In exchange for this information, the auction company issues a bidding number. When Online Guy makes a purchase, he is emailed an invoice, and his credit card is typically processed for the purchase (in some instances alternative arrangements are made). Only once payment has been secured and verified as in the account of the auctioneer is Online Guy allowed his purchases. In addition, every transaction that Online Guy makes is tallied and tracked. His complete purchasing history and payment history is logged in a database.

Something Doesn’t Add Up
Somewhere along the line, because we can look a buyer in the face, we’ll give them a credit card (i.e. bidder’s number) with no credit limit, allow them to take their purchase home prior to verification that the funds are good (i.e. bounced check). However, in instances where we can not look a buyer in the face, we require additional safeguards, and in actuality have more historical data about the online buyer (i.e. purchase and payment history) than the onsite buyer. Somehow that just doesn’t add up, and in fact seems backwards.

Auction companies need to apply the same set of registration terms to both online and onsite bidders. In fact, approving an online bidder to participate in your auction that has a history of purchasing and paying for items is safer than handing bidding numbers out to anyone that produces a valid photo ID in person. By overly restricting online buyers, auctioneers are dampening the impact online buyers will have on the bottom line of an auction, and are not serving the seller’s best interest.