<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John D Schultz &#187; social networks &raquo; John D Schultz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johndschultz.com/tag/social-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johndschultz.com</link>
	<description>auctioneer, runner, sports fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:27:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='johndschultz.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Updating both Facebook and Twitter with the same status?  You&#8217;re probably doing it wrong!</title>
		<link>http://johndschultz.com/updating-both-facebook-and-twitter-with-the-same-status-youre-probably-doing-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://johndschultz.com/updating-both-facebook-and-twitter-with-the-same-status-youre-probably-doing-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crying wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inconsiderate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informational link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[struggle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrong way]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndschultz.com/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All this social networking can be intimidating.  In the struggle to stay on top of the two major sites Facebook and Twitter, it has been increasingly common for the same status to serve both services.  I&#8217;m all for it.  In fact, I do this for our company page and personally.  Yet, most get it all wrong! &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://johndschultz.com/updating-both-facebook-and-twitter-with-the-same-status-youre-probably-doing-it-wrong/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this social networking can be intimidating.  In the struggle to stay on top of the two major sites <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a>, it has been increasingly common for the same status to serve both services.  I&#8217;m all for it.  In fact, I do this for our company page and personally.  Yet, most get it all wrong!</p>
<p>Like I said, I&#8217;m all for implementing a &#8220;touch it once&#8221; philosophy when it comes to posting to Facebook and Twitter.  However, I&#8217;m all for it being done correctly.  You may be asking yourself &#8220;there&#8217;s a right way and a wrong way?&#8221;  I&#8217;m here to tell you that indeed there is a wrong way and a right way.</p>
<p>First, the wrong way.  It seems simple enough to enable the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/twitter/">Facebook to Twitter application</a>.  Using this application, offered by Facebook, posts your Facebook status to Twitter.  However, when it posts the status it also posts a link.  The link directs users to your status on Facebook.  No more information is obtained by clicking on the link.  Fundamentally, links should be informational, and the use of a link to direct me to the exact information I just read is inefficient, and inconsiderate of your reader&#8217;s time!</p>
<p>Now, the right way.  You should be posting from Twitter to Facebook.  Why? Because Twitter is set up to share 140-character messages (similar to a status in Facebook).  Using any number of applications &#8211; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=115463795461&amp;ref=ts">Selective Tweets</a>, a Facebook app; <a href="http://seesmic.com/">Seesmic</a>, a standalone social network app; and my favorite <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/">TweetDeck</a>, a standalone social network app &#8211; you can update your Twitter status and your Facebook status (even multiple accounts &#8211; I have both personal and work Twitter and Facebook accounts) from one place.  You can easily share links that give context to your status and not send readers to links that share no more information.</p>
<p>Why is this important?  Because, when providing me with links that offer no other information, it&#8217;s like crying wolf.  I eventually tune out your links, and stop clicking on them all together.  Which means, when you do provide an informational link, I&#8217;m likely to miss it altogether because you&#8217;ve cried wolf so many times!</p>
<p>Take a serious look at how you&#8217;re implementing your social networking.  If you&#8217;re using Facebook to update Twitter, you need to understand what the Twitter user is experiencing, and how you&#8217;re negatively impacting their experiences!  If you&#8217;re trying to reach both social networks and their users, you need to act like you belong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johndschultz.com/updating-both-facebook-and-twitter-with-the-same-status-youre-probably-doing-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social networking: It&#8217;s engaging not broadcasting</title>
		<link>http://johndschultz.com/social-networking-its-engaging-not-broadcasting/</link>
		<comments>http://johndschultz.com/social-networking-its-engaging-not-broadcasting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auction companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[front page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occasions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndschultz.com/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of late, the buzz words in the auction industry, and many industries, are &#8220;social networking.&#8221;  However, the implementation thus far within the auction industry has been spotty at best, and when implemented most get it all wrong. I&#8217;ve written about social networking on two separate occasions in the past both in May of 2008: &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://johndschultz.com/social-networking-its-engaging-not-broadcasting/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of late, the buzz words in the auction industry, and many industries, are &#8220;social networking.&#8221;  However, the implementation thus far within the auction industry has been spotty at best, and when implemented most get it all wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written about social networking on two separate occasions in the past both in May of 2008: <a href="http://johndschultz.com/jumping-into-the-social-conversation-without-drowning/">Jumping into the social conversation without drowning</a>; and <a href="http://johndschultz.com/connecting-via-social-networks/">Connecting via social networks</a>.  There is some good information that is still pertinent to conversations about social networking, especially in the jumping without drowning post.</p>
<p>In fact, in the jumping without drowning post, I review an article about 12 tips for success in social media.  The last 6 tips focus on &#8220;diving into social media&#8221; and are: 7. Engage Your Audience; 8. Engage Your Employees; 9. Engage Your Customers; 10. Be Honest and Authentic; 11. Define Metrics According to Business Objectives; and 12. Fail Quickly. Fail Cheaply.</p>
<p>As I look at that short list two things jump out.  First: engage, engage, engage; and second: honest and authentic.  This is where most auction companies get it wrong.  For the most part auction companies understand honest and authentic.  But it&#8217;s the engage, engage, engage part where the mark is completely missed.</p>
<p>Auction companies broadcast market events.  They mail hundreds and sometimes thousands of brochures, run multitudes of display ads, and run minutes or more of commercials on radio.  Often, this is just the beginning of the marketing campaign.  However, did you notice one thing these methods all have in common?  Broadcast, broadcast, broadcast.</p>
<p>A primary tenant of social networking is to engage honestly and authentically.  Yet, my experience has been auction companies are so trapped in broadcast mode that they fail to engage.  Rather, they fall back on the old reliable method of broadcast marketing.</p>
<p>What does this mean?  It means almost all the auction companies I follow broadcast links to auctions.  That&#8217;s not engaging.  Where is the insider information and tips?  What about links to resources you find, or articles you found interesting?  What about writing informational articles, and then passing that information along via Twitter or Facebook in the form of a link?</p>
<p>What if auction companies engaged their customers?  Companies could promote resources for buyers and for sellers, pass along industry information, provide behind-the-scenes information about upcoming auctions, and so much more.  What about actually interacting and having conversations with customers via Facebook and Twitter?  When it comes time for a customer to use an auctioneer, who are they going to look to first?  The company that merely blasts information, or the company that engages and interacts?  The company that provides useful resources and information to the consumer or the company that merely broadcasts notice about their next auction?</p>
<p>Now, our company is just as guilty of broadcasting, or I should say was just as guilty.  In fact, initially, we set up our website to automatically broadcast every new auction, real estate listing, and update to our <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Upsala-MN/Schultz-Auctioneers-Landmark-Realty-Inc/9817157890?ref=ts">Facebook page</a>.  However, we recently turned that feature off.  At the same time, we added our company to Twitter (<a href="http://twitter.com/sauctioneers">@SAuctioneers</a>).  We did turn on a feature that will automatically tweet anytime we add a new listing, auction, or update to our website.  However, we&#8217;re determined to share links and information to our followers on Facebook and Twitter.  In fact, we&#8217;ve incorporated a section called &#8220;We&#8217;re all a Twitter&#8221; to the <a href="http://schultzauctioneerslandmarkrealty.com/">front page of our website</a> which displays our two most recent tweets.  Consumers will be able to follow us on Twitter, Facebook or the front page of our website for engaging, honest, and authentic information.  They&#8217;ll be able to interact with us, learn from us, and teach us.  We&#8217;ll be able to share with them, and them with us.  It will be social and relational.</p>
<p>In the end, what are you doing to be social?  Are you broadcasting at the top of your lungs, or are you setting out to engage honestly and authentically those that come in contact with your company?  Given the choice, I know with which person I&#8217;d want to hang out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johndschultz.com/social-networking-its-engaging-not-broadcasting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

