<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Governance on John Schultz</title><link>https://johndschultz.com/tags/governance/</link><description>Recent content in Governance on John Schultz</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.155.3</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://johndschultz.com/tags/governance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Yin and Yang of Governance</title><link>https://johndschultz.com/thoughts/the-yin-and-yang-of-governance/</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://johndschultz.com/thoughts/the-yin-and-yang-of-governance/</guid><description>Allowing instinctual, &amp;#39;grey-hair&amp;#39; decisions to lead while structurally forcing them to keep standing appointments with the truth.</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you choose convenience, you decline. That&rsquo;s a human law.</p>
<p>In business, commentary is the ultimate convenience. It is easy to write a forecast, spin a narrative, or make a decision because &ldquo;it makes sense at the time.&rdquo; But commentary naturally drifts and flatters us, and human memory decays too quickly to defend the truth. A typo can sit wrong by $1.2M for eleven months because nobody was forced to check the record.</p>
<p>We can&rsquo;t rely on willpower or manual documentation to catch this. The only solution is structural: we must design scheduled collisions where commentary is mechanically forced to meet the raw system of record.</p>
<p>But this structural yang has a yin. The most valuable decisions in a business are often &ldquo;grey-hair&rdquo; calls. These are the instinctual, non-data-driven decisions born of decades in the trenches. If you outlaw instinct, you strip the business of its soul and its competitive edge.</p>
<p>The unlock isn&rsquo;t choosing between spreadsheets and gut calls. It is building a system where they live in harmony. You don&rsquo;t block the grey-hair risk. You simply ensure that every time instinct deviates from the record, the deviation is auto-flagged and documented in an easy-to-find way. You let the gut lead, but you force it to keep its standing appointments with the truth.</p>
<hr>
<h2 id="open-questions">Open questions</h2>
<ol>
<li>How do we build automated flagging into our daily operations without creating notification fatigue that people eventually ignore?</li>
<li>What is the most critical instinctual decision in our pipeline today that is running without a scheduled date to face its record?</li>
<li>How do we design the user interface of our tools to elevate these flags constructively, keeping the Socratic friction helpful rather than annoying?</li>
</ol>
<hr>
<p><em>Connects to <a href="/thoughts/cognitive-defense-against-default-drift/">Cognitive Defense Against Default Drift</a> and <a href="/thoughts/systemic-rivals-against-default-drift/">Systemic Rivals Against Default Drift</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>